Saturday 16 February 2008

CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN RATEABLE VALUES




Hi people

the following letter if off in the post as of today 16th Feb 2008. It is something that some of the USUAL SUSPECTS really ought to have sorted out for me and the hundreds of thousands of other vulnerable adults in the UK, but they have refused to hold a public inquiry into these matters. Why? Probably because its me who has raised the issues.

The letter will be self explanitory to them and to the water company, who I trust in the fullness of time will be seen for what they are RIP OFF MERCHANTS. Will anyone bother to investigate this on the vulnerables behalf, the conflict of interest in the Rateable Valuer???

Only via the European Court of Human Rights it would appear, although I am fast losing faith that they are on the case. Here is the letter then to the Department of Works n Pensions dudes in Cardiff Jobcentreplus.

To: Tony Powell
Manager
Jobcentreplus

15th Feb 2008

Hi Mr. Powell re: your 5th feb 2008 letter

I am appealing your decision in the recent letter about my income support from your dept. The part I am appealing is the amount taken out for water. Under legislation the water company are bound by law to write off debts if a debtor is living on a limited income and have been paying off their debt for 2 years.

I believe that date ran out in 2002. I have applied via the citizen advice bureau and the first attempt failed for no particular reason?????? The second time I applied I refused to fill in the ‘what do you spend your money on?’ form. That the water company demand. I pointed out to the advisor that I believe my filling it in would prejudice my claim and asked the advisor to send it off with that written on the form. She refused??

I have written a number of blogs about this, sent it to the so-called great and good, like the first minister at the Welsh Assembly, pointing out that the water companies demand for the form to be filled in was in-fact in breech of human rights legislation in respect of my right to privacy. Unfortunately the Great and Good turned out to not be so.

You can access the details at
http://bbccrazydave.blogspot.com if you have independent access to the www.

I trust that this is enough to start the appeal process. If there were any real social justice, the unnecessary hardship that the water companies refusal to act on legislative requirements has caused me over these last 6 years ought to be more than just making them pay me back the over payments I have made due to their obvious prejudice towards my claim for the debt to be written off.

Another thing I raised with government is that the rateable value for this property is higher than that of a non-divided property in the area. That as it has been cut in half that the RV ought to be half of a house charge. That indeed there is a conflict of interest by the person (a council employee) who dreamt up the RV of this property, as the pro rata rent is greater than that of a non-divided house, plus it means that the council can also claim greater community charge.

The rent aspect could indeed be seen as defrauding the Department of Work and pensions via the housing benefit scheme that the council partake of. So I would also appeal Dwr Cymru’s right to take out their annual charge, at the rate that they do.

Your reference xxxxxxxxx(excluded for privacy reasons)


All the best
David Gabriel 15 blah de blah de blah address


For a full list of blogs go to http://bbccrazydave.blogspot.com

FIRST MINISTER FOR YOUR INFORMATION THEY PLAN TO TAKE OUT £11.14 PER WEEK NEARLY HALF THAT OF THE LATEST MP RISE FORECAST AMAZING ISN'T IT. THE SHARE HOLDERS OF DWR CYMRU DOING VERY NICELY AT THE VULNERABLES EXPENSE.